Change set
Pick exam & year, then Go.
Question map
With reference to "Blockchain Technology", consider the following statements : 1. It is a public ledger that everyone can inspect, but which no single user 2. The structure and design of blockchain is such that all the data in it are about cryptocurrency only. 3. Applications that depend on basic features of blockchain can be developed without anybody's permission. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (1 and 3 only) based on the fundamental principles of distributed ledger technology.
- Statement 1 is correct: Blockchain is a distributed, decentralized public ledger. It allows transparency as all participants can inspect the chain, but its cryptographic consensus mechanism ensures that no single entity has unilateral control over the data.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: While blockchain gained fame through Bitcoin, it is a foundational technology. Its utility extends far beyond cryptocurrency to include supply chain management, voting systems, smart contracts, and healthcare records. It is not restricted to financial data.
- Statement 3 is correct: "Permissionless" blockchains (like Ethereum) allow developers to build Decentralized Applications (dApps) using the network's protocols without seeking approval from a central authority.
Therefore, since statements 1 and 3 accurately describe the technology's decentralized and versatile nature, while statement 2 is over-restrictive, Option 4 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Definition + Application' question. While Statement 1 is found verbatim in standard economy texts (Singhania), the real key is logical elimination. Statement 2 is an 'extreme limiter' ('only cryptocurrency'), which contradicts the basic current affairs knowledge that blockchain is used for supply chains, land records, and voting.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Whether blockchain technology is a public ledger that anyone can inspect.
- Statement 2: Whether blockchain technology is not controlled by any single user or authority (i.e., is decentralized).
- Statement 3: Whether the structure and design of blockchain technology restricts all data stored on a blockchain to cryptocurrency-related information only.
- Statement 4: Whether applications that depend on basic features of blockchain technology can be developed without anyone's permission (permissionless development).
- Explicitly states most blockchains are public and that anyone can view the chainβs full record.
- Connects openness of protocols and decentralization to public visibility of on-chain activity.
- Defines permissionless blockchains as open platforms where anyone may publish blocks.
- Says this property results in anyone being able to read the blockchain as well as issue transactions.
- Describes blockchain as an open distributed ledger that records transactions in a verifiable and permanent way.
- Frames blockchain as a decentralised ledger, reinforcing that its records are shared and inspectable.
Explicitly describes blockchain as 'a public ledger that everyone can inspect', giving a clear textbook characterization of blockchain's access model.
A student could compare this textbook claim with known public vs private blockchains (e.g., permissioned ledgers) using basic external knowledge to judge if 'anyone can inspect' always holds.
Calls blockchain a 'decentralized ledger-based' technology used for cryptocurrencies, highlighting the ledger and decentralization aspects linked to public visibility.
Combine this with the general fact that decentralization often implies distributed copies of a ledger to infer that many participants can view transaction records.
Refers to blockchain as 'Distributed Ledger Technology' supporting digital currency and emphasises trust and regulation, implying shared ledger properties.
A student can contrast 'distributed ledger' with centralized ledgers to evaluate whether distributed implies public access or merely shared among permissioned nodes.
Describes blockchain delivering 'secure and transparent' transactions in a finance application, suggesting transparency (inspectability) is a design feature.
Using the general link between transparency and public auditability, a student could check if 'transparent' in practice means publicly readable or only auditable by participants.
Explains blockchain as the backend for transaction mining and generation of cryptocurrencies, reinforcing that blockchain records transactional data.
A student could use the fact that blockchain records transactions to investigate whether those records are globally readable or restricted to certain networks.
- Explicitly describes blockchain as a public ledger that everyone can inspect but which no single user controls.
- Directly frames lack of single-user control as a defining property of the technology.
- Identifies cryptocurrencies as based on decentralized ledger-based blockchain technology.
- Contrasts blockchain-based decentralization with government-issued centralized currency systems.
- Notes central banks' concern that independent cryptocurrencies could weaken their control, implying these currencies operate outside single-authority control.
- Frames blockchain-backed private currencies as independent from central bank/regulatory control.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Gives a concrete non-cryptocurrency use case (fertiliser movement) where blockchain stores transaction-related supply-chain data.
- Explicitly states blockchain is best suited for transaction records and does not require storing unrelated domain details.
- States that the type of blockchain determines what data is stored, implying blockchain is not limited to cryptocurrency data alone.
- Gives Bitcoin as an example (sender, receiver, amount) while leaving open other blockchains to store other data types.
- Describes hybrid/private permissioned blockchains used by organisations to control who can access specific data stored on the blockchain.
- Implies blockchains can store varied, non-cryptocurrency data and that access/visibility of that data is configurable.
Gives a concrete example where blockchain platform is used for warehouse receipt finance (loans, IoT, smart contracts) β non-cryptocurrency data and processes.
A student could note this real-world use and check other industry use-cases (supply chain, finance records) to judge whether blockchain is limited to crypto-only data.
States CBDCs would 'benefit from the same blockchain technology (Distributed Ledger Technology)' while being legal-tender payments, implying blockchain supports non-crypto monetary uses.
Extend by comparing definitions of CBDC versus cryptocurrencies to see if blockchain data must be crypto-native or can represent fiat-backed instruments.
Defines cryptocurrencies as 'based on decentralized ledger-based blockchain technology,' linking blockchain to crypto but framing blockchain as an underlying ledger technology rather than inherently limited to crypto.
Use this general definition to distinguish the underlying ledger (blockchain) from one class of applications (cryptocurrencies) and test whether other applications can use the same ledger.
Mentions ICOs and start-ups 'dealing in blockchain technology' using tokens for fundraising, showing blockchain used for fundraising/asset representation beyond just currency transfer.
A student could survey tokenization and ICO use-cases to infer that blockchain can store project/funder-related data, not only currency transactions.
Contains a textbook multiple-choice item that explicitly asserts the claim (statement 2) as a proposition to be judged, indicating the claim is contentious and treated as a testable assertion.
Use this to motivate checking textbook or syllabus explanations that distinguish blockchain's properties versus specific crypto applications to evaluate the claim.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Explicitly defines a public blockchain as 'permission-less', directly tying blockchain type to development without central permission.
- States public blockchains are open distributed ledgers where any node can participate, implying permissionless development of applications on such networks.
- Describes the distributed environment and peer-to-peer operation, indicating there is no central control to grant or deny permission.
- Highlights 'No single point of failure as there is no central control', supporting the idea that applications can be developed without a central authority's approval.
- Notes that blockchain creates trust organically without trusted intermediaries, implying developers need not obtain permission from intermediaries.
- States smart contract code and agreements exist across a distributed, decentralized blockchain network, supporting permissionless deployment of application logic.
The snippet lists as a proposition that 'Applications that depend on basic features of blockchain can be developed without anybody's permission', showing this is a recognized claim or testable idea in the material.
A student could treat this as a hypothesis and compare it with descriptions of blockchain decentralization and real-world examples (permissioned vs permissionless) to evaluate plausibility.
States that cryptocurrencies are 'based on the decentralized ledger-based blockchain technology' which 'seeks to make the currency system decentralized, unlike ... centralized form' β implying absence of single controller.
Combine this with the definition of 'decentralized' to infer whether development and deployment might occur without central permission (i.e., open networks vs controlled platforms).
Describes mining and that systems are rewarded for solving puzzles on the blockchain backend, illustrating an open participation mechanism (miners) contributing to the network.
Use the open-mining example to reason that some blockchain systems allow participants to join and run applications without prior authorization.
Notes 'Anyone with a Bitcoin address can send and receive Bitcoins from anyone else', which exemplifies permissionless transaction capability on a public blockchain.
A student could generalize that if value transfer can be done by any address, some applications built on similar public chains might likewise not require centralized permission.
Describes a startup ('Whrrl') using a blockchain platform to onboard a state coop bank and enable faster loan processes, an example of a permissioned/industry-specific deployment.
Contrast this permissioned, institution-onboarded use with public-blockchain examples to test whether 'without anyone's permission' applies universally or only to some blockchains.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter via Elimination. Statement 2 is logically flawed (extreme 'only'). Source: General Tech Awareness + Nitin Singhania (Ch 8 Practice Qs).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Science & Tech > Emerging Technologies > Digital Infrastructure (DLT, Web 3.0, Crypto).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize these siblings: 1) Public vs. Private (Permissioned) Blockchain. 2) Proof of Work (PoW) vs. Proof of Stake (PoS). 3) Smart Contracts (Ethereum). 4) NFT (Non-Fungible) vs. Fungible Tokens. 5) Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying tech, never stop at the definition. Always ask: 'Is this limited to one sector?' (No, tech is general-purpose). 'Who controls it?' (Decentralization). 'How do I build on it?' (Open source/Permissionless).
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
Blockchain is described as a decentralized or distributed ledger, contrasting it with centralized record systems.
High-yield for UPSC because questions probe governance, financial infrastructure and decentralisation; mastering this clarifies policy debates on control, regulation and systemic risk. It links to topics on cryptocurrencies, central bank digital currencies, and financial sector regulation and enables comparative questions on centralized vs decentralized systems.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Advantages of CBDC > p. 79
Blockchain is associated with transparency and secure transfer, which bears on whether records can be inspected or audited.
Important for answering questions on accountability, traceability and misuse risks (e.g., money laundering) in digital payments. Understanding transparency helps tackle questions about privacy trade-offs, regulatory oversight and applications in supply chains or finance.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > Use of Blockchain technology in Warehouse Receipt Finance > p. 373
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
Blockchain/DLT is repeatedly tied to cryptocurrencies and payment systems in the material.
Useful for questions on CBDC design, the role of private crypto vs regulated digital currencies, and fintech policy. This concept connects technology to macro-financial policy, regulation and inclusion issues that frequently appear in prelims/mains.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > What are Crypto currencies? > p. 77
Blockchain is a public ledger architecture designed so no single user or authority controls the record of transactions.
High-yield for definitions and conceptual clarity in polity and economy questions; helps compare governance models (centralized vs decentralized) and answer questions on transparency, trust and distributed governance. Enables answers on technology fundamentals, system design, and limits of centralized oversight.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 8: Financial Market > 2020 > p. 245
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
Blockchain/DLT underpins cryptocurrencies to decentralize the currency system, contrasting with government-issued centralized money.
Useful for policy and economics essays and mains answers on digital currencies, CBDC design choices and trade-offs; connects to topics on monetary sovereignty, financial infrastructure, and technology adoption strategy.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Advantages of CBDC > p. 79
Independent cryptocurrencies built on blockchain can operate outside central bank control and may affect financial-system authority.
Important for debates on regulation, financial stability and CBDC policy; equips aspirants to discuss regulatory responses, risks of private digital currencies and reasons for central bank digital currency initiatives.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Why RBI launched e-Rupee? > p. 78
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
Blockchain is a form of distributed ledger technology that can be applied to record and transfer many types of information, not solely cryptocurrency transactions.
High-yield for questions on fintech, digital governance and public policy: distinguishes underlying technology (DLT) from one particular use-case (cryptocurrencies). Helps tackle questions comparing tech capabilities with sectoral applications (payments, identity, records). Links to topics in economy, banking and digital infrastructure policies.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > CRYPTOCURRENCIES > p. 160
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Advantages of CBDC > p. 79
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > Use of Blockchain technology in Warehouse Receipt Finance > p. 373
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The 'Next Logical Question' is on Zero Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) or 'Soulbound Tokens'. Since they asked about the public nature of the ledger, they will likely ask about privacy layers on top of it (how to verify age without revealing birthdate).
Apply the 'Technological Evolution' Logic. Technology evolves to find new uses. Statement 2 says blockchain data is about cryptocurrency *only*. This implies the tech cannot be adapted for anything else (like voting or medical records). This defies the nature of software. Eliminate 2 β Answer is likely D.
Mains GS-3 (Internal Security & Economy): Contrast Blockchain as a tool for 'Money Laundering' (Layering stage via crypto) vs. Blockchain for 'Good Governance' (Tamper-proof Land Records and PDS Supply Chain tracking).
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.